COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF TWO METHODS OF AXIAL FATIGUE STRENGTH CALCULATION

ZHENG YuTian; LIU ShaoJun

doi:10.16579/j.issn.1001.9669.2017.01.032

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF TWO METHODS OF AXIAL FATIGUE STRENGTH CALCULATION

更新时间：2022-09-22

- COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF TWO METHODS OF AXIAL FATIGUE STRENGTH CALCULATION
- Journal of Mechanical Strength Vol. 39, Issue 1, Pages: 188-193(2017)
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中南大学机电工程学院
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.16579/j.issn.1001.9669.2017.01.032
  CLC：
扫描看全文
ZHENG YuTian, LIU ShaoJun. COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF TWO METHODS OF AXIAL FATIGUE STRENGTH CALCULATION. [J]. 39(1):188-193(2017)
DOI：

ZHENG YuTian, LIU ShaoJun. COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF TWO METHODS OF AXIAL FATIGUE STRENGTH CALCULATION. [J]. 39(1):188-193(2017) DOI： 10.16579/j.issn.1001.9669.2017.01.032.

摘要

比较国内机械设计手册以及美国国家标准即AGMA(美国齿轮协会)ANSI-AGMA 6001-D97标准(下称:AGMA标准)中对轴类疲劳强度研究的两种方法;通过对相关文献中具体计算细节的分析以及实际算例的对比,找出主要差异,分析这两种方法在实际应用中的适应情况。

Abstract

Comparative analysis of two methods of analysis shaft fatigue strength including Chinese Machine Design Handbook method and American National Standard namely AGMA（ American Gear Manufacturers Association） standard ANSIAGMA 6001-D97 method. This essayanalysisthesecalculation process about these two methods and set examples to find out there major difference and their adaption to different situations.

关键词

ANSI-AGMA6001-D97轴类疲劳强度比较

Keywords

ANSI-AGMA 6001-D97Fatigue strength of shaftComparison

references

Views

282

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

No data

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

⁰